Direct Indoctrination of Our Kids & The Rewriting of the Constitution.

I swear, maybe I should make the title of my Blog "OMG, have you seen the latest?" .. because that's pretty much how I feel every time our new O-cult leader "King Hussein" takes another step toward radical liberal totalitarianism in the U.S. and with barely any resistance from any viewable source (hey, thanks "free" press, for your non-partisan approach to the news!) . .. I'm appalled as much as I am astounded by this, time after time. So, like any good American, I will share this pain with those I love (you guys!):

Anyway, what else is new, right? ... I'll tell you what:

Well, OF COURSE, Obama would pick the guy who started the organization (I know you've heard of this here in California) that infiltrates those pro-homosexual lifestyle books into the kindergarten classrooms and curriculum, to be his new "Safe Schools" Czar. ..why wouldn't he? .. This is the same guy who, in his "memoirs" (AKA: cliché coming out of the closet' blog) about how he hates conservative Christians .. even how he told God, at age 17 "...Screw you, buddy - I don't need you around anymore" . I think he'll just fit right in, don’t you?
( http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/printerfriendly.html?articleid=09092409 )


... and we REALLY need to reel in this whole Obama appointed-at-will "CZAR" thing ASAP .. its way, way out of hand.

This fits right in to his classroom indoctrination of the elementary school children though doesn't it?

( http://www.gopusa.com/commentary/mmalkin/2009/mm_09251.shtml )

... I guess I shouldn't be surprised that the N.J. School district who allowed this would remain un-apologetic, even quoting that they were only upset that someone took an "unauthorized video & audio recording of the event" more than they were about the Praise-Obama type of lyrics being taught to the kids.

( http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/09/25/principal-nj-school-long-obama-supporter/ )

Boy, it sure is nice to know that there are schools out there who stand up for what they believe so much, they want to keep it a nice big secret, hidden from everyone. ,, now that's MY kind of free-society-Liberalism! I guess if they can't praise God there anymore, they might as well praise someone, right? (freaking quacks!)

IMHO:

Unless its a legitimate part of the history, or the science of a particular subject, all politics, and religion need to be kept out of the classroom. Period. You are there to learn in public school: Reading, Writing, Math, Science, History, Music & Art. Not beliefs (religious or political). That's what private schools are for. Those things need to be taught at home or church .. heck even public facilities, like zoo's and museums (private not public) have all the rights to display their own angles on things as they wish. ...but NOT the government and not government-run institutions (again, unless it directly ties into the history or science of the subject. For example: Bilical Christianities influence not only on Europe, but the foundations of America ... or the science behind the evolutionary process and its direct tie-in to growing DNA evidence of intelligent-design (not the same as creationism, though it supports it).

(yes, we can show both .. you don't have to be a Darwinian to accept that we humans followed forms of evolutionary change such as adaptation and genetic mutation to arrive to our current genetic state [which is, no longer widely/fully believed to be random mutation, but pre-programmed in our DNA as a response to exposure to specific environmental and bacterial changes, & over shorter periods of time).


-Matt Forys

PS. Well, at least its not like Democrats are trying to hold a secret Constitutional Convention or something so that they can change the actual constitution of the united states without all those other branches of government getting in the way. Oh wait, I think they ARE: (below)

==================

A special message from United States Justice Foundation:

http://news.dienerconsultants.com/cimages/f87317c1e3c984e8afa2aaf2c74d402b/USJF.jpg

BARACK OBAMA AND HIS ALLIES ARE TRYING
TO CHANGE THE U.S. CONSTITUTION:
HELP US STOP A NEW CONSTITUTIONAL
CONVENTION!

Dear Friend,

BARACK OBAMA AND HIS ALLIES ARE TRYING TO CHANGE THE U.S. CONSTITUTION WITHOUT FOLLOWING THE AMENDMENT PROCESS -- IN FACT, THEY'RE TRYING TO REWRITE THE ENTIRE CONSTITUTION -- AND THEY'RE CLOSE TO SUCCEEDING!

What would you think if an amendment to the U.S. Constitution was introduced by liberal Democrat Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, which repealed the First Amendment in the Bill of Rights -- taking away our right to Free Speech?

What would you think if an amendment to the U.S. Constitution was introduced by liberal Democrat Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, which repealed the Second Amendment in the Bill of Rights -- taking away our right to Keep and Bear Arms? (A right that the U.S. Supreme Court recently upheld!)

"That could never happen," you say. "No one would allow it!" Right? Well...

Did you know that there are TWO ways that our Constitution can be changed? And did you know that Pelosi, Reid and Barack Obama are using the less well-known way, without having to actually introduce amendments?

IT'S TRUE -- and WE have to stop it NOW!

One way to change the Constitution is to go through the amendment process -- a long and tedious process requiring two-thirds of both houses of Congress to pass an amendment, and then three-fourths of the states to ratify it.

That means a "super-majority" of our representatives at the National and State levels would have to be in favor of the amendment -- which safeguards us from the possibility of really "bad" amendments.

BUT... there is one other way that our Constitution can be changed... and it DOES NOT require all of those elected representatives to be in favor of it. It's called a Constitutional Convention, and all that it requires is 34 states to ask Congress to call one.

In fact, right now, all that is needed is for two more states to ask for a Constitutional Convention... and the basic law of the land could be changed forever by Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi, and Harry Reid!

Most people don't realize that Article V of the Constitution requires Congress to call a new Constitutional Convention (a "Con Con") if two-thirds (or 34) of the states request it. We've only had one other "Con Con" in our history: the one where the original Constitution was written in 1787!

The language of Article V is mandatory: it says that Congress "shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments" whenever requests are received from two-thirds of the states. Note that the word "amendments" is used in the plural. These are the only instructions we have about a Constitutional Convention. There are no other rules or guidelines.

We don't know how a Constitutional Convention would be apportioned, or how the delegates would be elected. We don't know what rules the Convention would operate under. We don't know whether changes to the Constitution could be proposed by a simple majority, or would require a super majority, of those attending. We don't know if the agenda could be limited or would be wide open to any proposal.

We don't know ANYTHING about how a Con Con would work -- which means that it will come down to Congress setting the rules!

And Congress is controlled by the most radically liberal Democrats in American history! Is that who we want to be in charge of a new Constitutional Convention?

Do we want BARACK OBAMA, NANCY PELOSI, and HARRY REID to completely rewrite our most basic document of law?

WE NEED YOUR HELP, RIGHT NOW, TO STOP BARACK OBAMA
AND HIS ALLIES FROM CHANGING THE U.S. CONSTITUTION. CLICK HERE:
http://conservativeactionalertsupdates.com/go.php/569288/2838913/3806270


The fact is, under the vague language of Article V, a Constitutional Convention cannot be limited. It would be wide open, and able to consider ANY change in the Constitution that was proposed!

Former U. S. Supreme Court Chief Justice Warren Burger once said, "There is no effective way to limit or muzzle the actions of a Constitutional Convention. The convention could make its own rules and set its own agenda."

The Stanford Law School Professor whose case-book is used in the majority of U.S. law schools, Gerald Gunther, said that, even if Congress tried to limit the Convention to one subject, the delegates could decide for themselves that the Convention "is entitled to set its own agenda."

This means that, even if supporters of a "Con Con" claim that the convention would only cover one issue -- whether it's a balanced budget amendment or removing the requirement that to be eligible to serve as President, one must be a "natural born citizen," or anything else -- there is NO WAY to stop the Convention from changing EVERYTHING that we hold dear in America!

Barack Obama and his far-left supporters would be able to get THEIR people appointed as delegates to the Convention, so that THEIR agendas would be the Convention's agenda, and THEIR plans for socialism in America would come to pass.

Say BYE-BYE to the First Amendment's freedom of speech -- Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity could be taken off the air.

Say BYE-BYE to the Second Amendment's right to bear arms -- a total gun ban could be the law of the land!

Say BYE-BYE to the Constitution's requirement that to serve as President a man or a woman must be a "natural born citizen"!

You KNOW that's what they'll do if given the chance -- and we're only TWO STATES AWAY from seeing a Constitutional Convention convened!

You see, Article V says that it takes a request from two-thirds of the states to force a "Con Con" -- but it doesn't say there's any time limit on getting to that total!

Thirty-two states have already issued a call for a "Con Con" over the last few decades, including Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, and Wyoming.

It only takes 34 states to REQUIRE a Constitutional Convention be convened!

Some states, like Georgia, Virginia, and others, have since voted to "rescind" their call for a "Con Con" -- BUT no one is sure whether those "rescission" votes are actually Constitutional...so the danger is REAL!

WE NEED YOUR HELP, RIGHT NOW, TO STOP BARACK OBAMA
AND HIS ALLIES FROM CHANGING THE U.S. CONSTITUTION:
CLICK HERE NOW!

The United States Justice Foundation is launching a major campaign to STOP a "Con Con" from taking place -- WE MUST CREATE a tremendous outpouring of publicity and public scrutiny to be given to this danger, so that Barack Obama and his radical liberal allies can't "sneak this past us" without anyone noticing, until it's too late. Right now, our staff is conducting legal and historical research, and preparing legal opinions, to submit to every state legislature, if necessary, and we'll be offering to represent any state, or state legislator, in fighting the Con-Con based on those documents.

We're also going to be leading a grassroots effort to attack this issue at both the state and federal levels: At the state level, leading the charge in every state to either NOT VOTE for a "Con Con" (if they haven't voted yet) or to RESCIND their past vote in favor (if they have). And, at the federal level, we'll be mobilizing citizens across the country to contact their Representatives and Senators to DEMAND that they come out, NOW, and announce their support for a state's right to rescind, and that they won't support a call for a "Con-Con." In addition, we'll be calling on the Attorney General of the United States, and the Attorney General of each and every State that has passed a "Con-Con" resolution, to issue an official Opinion on the legality of rescission.

THIS DANGER IS REAL. The Constitutional Convention of 1787 was called for the exclusive purpose of amending the Articles of Confederation. Once the Founding Fathers assembled in Philadelphia, however, they threw out the Articles of Confederation and wrote an entirely new Constitution, and even changed the ratification procedure so they could get it adopted more easily. The 1787 Convention is the only precedent we have for a national Constitutional Convention.

There's no guarantee that all of the changes to our Constitution passed at a Constitutional Convention would need to be ratified by 34 states this time -- if a "Con Con" can change our structure of government as defined in Articles I, II, and III, of the Constitution, then it can also change the Article V requirement that three-fourths of the states are needed to ratify any changes. The Convention of 1787 reduced the number of states required to ratify a change from 100% of the states to 75%, and a Convention today could "follow their example" and reduce it further, to 66%, or 60%, or even 51%!

WE MUST NOT LET THIS HAPPEN! CLICK HERE:
http://conservativeactionalertsupdates.com/go.php/569288/2838913/3806270

There's very little time to ramp this project up to FULL SPEED -- we need to raise at least $100,000 to prepare and distribute legal opinions, lobby state legislators and begin our grassroots activism campaign this coming month. Please, CLICK HERE NOW to make your best possible donation, and let's STOP Obama, Pelosi and Reid from ripping our Constitution to shreds, and re-writing it to their own socialist goals!

Sincerely,
http://news.dienerconsultants.com/cimages/f87317c1e3c984e8afa2aaf2c74d402b/sig_garykreep.jpg
Gary Kreep, Executive Director
United States Justice Foundation

P.S. President Barack Obama has already expressed his belief that the U.S. Constitution needs to be interpreted in the context of current affairs and events. Can you imagine what he and his supporters would DO to that document if given the chance to re-write it completely? Our Bill of Rights could disappear overnight!

In fact, all the way back in 2006, Obama already had his lawyers researching how someone could get around the eligibility requirements to serve as U.S. President -- these people simply don't CARE about whether we preserve the supreme law of the land!

Remember -- when the last Constitutional Convention met in 1787, the original goal was to amend the Articles of Confederation. Instead, delegates simply threw them out and wrote a whole new Constitution.

That's EXACTLY what Obama, Pelosi and Reid would do this time -- but this time, the result would destroy our freedoms. Please, CLICK HERE NOW to help us STOP them. Thank you!

WE NEED YOUR HELP, RIGHT NOW, TO STOP BARACK OBAMA
AND HIS ALLIES FROM CHANGING THE U.S. CONSTITUTION:
CLICK HERE NOW!

To donate by check, make payable to:
United States Justice Foundation
932 D Street Suite 1
Ramona, CA 92065

Ready or not, here I come

Well, I've finally done it. After being an old-school techie for so long, I've finally decided to graduate and upgrade MYSELF this time to v2.0 .. or maybe that's Matt-web2.0? I never realised .. or at least never wanted to admit, that so many people would be SOOOO into talking about themselves and giving out their opinions that they'd actually take their precious time to write a blog and even to do it regularly!



In a seemingly liberal world that openly chastises those who, or at least complain largely about those who verbally impose their beliefs on others, I guess they have to justify that urge, not through self control or discipline, but in some other way ... like blogging!
I guess this way, no one is "technically" forcing their opinions on ANYONE ... at least not anyone who doesn't want to listen, right?